Chemical Science International Journal

  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions & Author Guideline
    • Articles in Press
    • Editorial Policy
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewers
    • Propose a Special Issue
    • Reprints
    • Subscription
    • Membership
    • Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
    • Digital Archiving Policy
    • Contact
  • Archives
  • Indexing
  • Publication Charge
  • Books
  • Testimonials
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. 2020 - Volume 29 [Issue 2]
  4. Original Research Article

Submit Manuscript


Subscription



  • Home Page
  • Author Guidelines
  • Editorial Board Member
  • Editorial Policy
  • Propose a Special Issue
  • Membership

Effect of Drilling Wastes on Urease Activities and Substrate Induced Respiration (SIR) in Wetland Soil of Delta and Bayelsa States, South-South, Nigeria

  • E. Mirinn
  • E. P. Berezi
  • K. T. Nwauche

Chemical Science International Journal, Page 34-47
DOI: 10.9734/CSJI/2020/v29i230162
Published: 16 March 2020

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract


The effect of drilling waste on urease activities and substrate-induced respiration in wetland soil of Niger Delta of Nigeria was investigated, using Fadama, mangrove and meander soils respectively. Urease activity and substrate-induced respiration (SIR) were measured after 1, 7, 14, 28, 42, 56, 70, 105 and 140 days of incubation to evaluate the effects of drilling waste on soil biochemical perimeters. Results obtained indicated that Fadama soil urease activities varied from 13.5 to 2.10 mg NH4 – Hg-1 dry soil in drilling waste. Mangrove soil varied from 13.5 to 2.22 mg NH4 – Ng-1 dry soil in drilling waste. Meander soil activities varied from 14.7 to 3.10 mg NH4 – Ng-1 dry soil in drilling waste. Also, the substrate-induced respiration in Fadama and mangrove soil range from 2.05 to 0.05 ml CO2 kg-1 24 h-1 in drilling waste respectively. Analysis of enzyme activities indicated positive relationship between urease activities and SIR (r = 0.78, p < 0.05 Fadama (r = 1, P < 0.05 Mangrove) and (r = 0.83, P < 0.05 Meander). There was also a positive relationship between 5%, 10% and 15% treatment levels in Fadama, meander and mangrove soils.


Keywords:
  • Soil enzymes
  • Substrate-Induced Respiration (SIR)
  • heavy metal
  • drilling waste.
  • Full Article PDF
  • Review History

How to Cite

Mirinn, E., Berezi, E. P., & Nwauche, K. T. (2020). Effect of Drilling Wastes on Urease Activities and Substrate Induced Respiration (SIR) in Wetland Soil of Delta and Bayelsa States, South-South, Nigeria. Chemical Science International Journal, 29(2), 34-47. https://doi.org/10.9734/CSJI/2020/v29i230162
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver

References

Doran JW, Parkin TB. Defining and assessing soil quality. In: Doran J.W. (Eds). Defining soil Quality for Sustainable Environment. SSSA special publication: Madison, W.I: Soil science society of America, Society of Agronomy, inc. 1994; 3–23.

Karlen DL, Mausbach MJ, Doran JW, Cline RG, Harris RF, Schuman GE. Soil quality: A concept, definition and framework for evaluation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1997;61:4 -10.

Houot S, Chaussod R. Impact of agricultural practice on the size and activity of soil microbial biomass in a long-term field experiment. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 1995;19:309 –316.

Anderson TH, Domsch KH. Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to total organic carbon in arable soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 1989;21:471–479.

Garcia C, Hernandez T, Cesta F, Ceccanti B. Biochemical parameters in soil regenerated by addition of organic wastes. Waste Management and Research. 1994;12:457–466.

Smith JL, papendick RI, Bezdicek DF, Lynch JM. Soil organic matter dynamics and crop residue management. In: Metting, B. (Ed). Soil Microbial Ecology. Marcel Dekker, New Youk. 1993;65–95.

Ross DJK, Tate R, Cairus A, Mayricbt KF, Pursic EA. Restoration of Pasture after topsoil removal: Effects of soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization, microbial and enzyme activities. Soil Biology and Bio-chemistry. 1982;14:575–581.

Sparling GP, Ord BG, Vaugham D. Microbial biomass and acativity in soils amended with glucose. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 1981;16:673–674.

Amann R, amd Ludwig W. Ribosmal RNA – targeted nucleic acid probes for studies on microbial acology. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2002;24:555–565.

Doran JW, Zeiss MR. Soil health and sustainability: Managing the biotic component of soil quality. Applied Soil Ecology. 2000;15:3–11.

Ogram A. Soil molecular microbial ecology at age 20: Methodological challenges for the future. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2000;32:1499 – 1504.

Pierce FJ, Larson WE. Developing criteria to evaluate sustainable land management. In: Kimble, J.M. (Eds). Proceeding of the VIII international soil management workshop utilization of soil survey informational for sustainable land use. Sacramento, CA. 1993;7 -14

Skujins J. Enzymes in soil. In McLaren A.D. and Peterson G.H. (Eds). Soil Biochemistry, Vol. 1. Marcel Dekker, Inc. new Youk. 1967;371– 414.

Dick RP. Soil enzymes activities as integrative indicators of soil health in: Pankhurst CE, Debube BM, Gupta VVSAR (Eds). Biology Indicators of Soil Health Wallingford, USA: CAB International. 1997;121–156.

Morris CE, Bardin M, Berge O, Frey-Klett, P, Fromin N, Girardin H, Guinebretiere MH, Lebaron P, Thiery JM, Troussellier M. (2002). Microbial biodiversity: Approaches to experimental design and hypothesis testing in primary scientific literature from 1975 to 1999. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2002;66:592–616.

Calderon JF, Jackson LE, Scow KM, Rolston DE. Microbial responses to stimulated tillage in cultivated and uncultivated soil. Soil Biol Biochem.2000; 32:1547 – 1559.

Macnaughton SJ, Stephen JR, Venosa AD, Davis GA, Chang YJ, White DC. Microbial population changes during bioremediation of an experimental oil spill. Appl. Environ. Microbial.1999;65:3566–3574.

Raeid MMA, Nimer MDS, Jurgen K, De Beer D, Yasser EN, Jurgen R, Feran GP. Microbial diversity of a heavily polluted mat and its community changes following degradation of petroleum compounds. Appl. Environment Microbial. 2002;68: 1674–1683.

Lawton JH. What do species do in ecosystem?Oikos. 1994;71:367–374.

Dibble AS, Cheng C, Biggar CAH. Polucyclic aromatic hydrocarbon carcinogens. In Pariza MW, Aeschbacher HU, Fenton JS, S. Sato (Eds) Mutagens and Carcinogensin the Diet. Wiley-Liss, New York. 1990;109– 127.

Verschueren K. Handbook of environ-mental data on organic chemicals. Van Nostrand reinhold, New York. 1983;9-28.

Steven DS, James JG, Kathy B, Charles, WG. Change in microbial community composition and function during a polyaromatic hydrocarbon phytore-mediation field trial. Appl. Environ. Microbial. 2003;69:483–489.

Killham K, Stuaddon WJ. Bioindicators and sensors of soil health and the application of geostatistics. In: RG. Burns and R.P. Dick (Eds). Enzymes in thje environment: Activity, Ecology and Applications. Marcel Dekke, New York. 2002;319–394.

Kandeler E, Kampichler C, Horak O. Influence of heavy metals on the functional diversity of soil microbial communities. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 1996;23: 299 – 306.

Ginadfreda L, Saninno F, Ortega N, Nannipieri P. Activity of free and immobilized urease in soil. Effect of pesticides. Soil Boil. Biochem.1994;26: 777 – 784.

Dick RP. A review: Long-term effects of agriculture systems on soil biochemical and microbial parameters. Agric. Ecosyst. Environment. 1992;40:25–36.

Prosper JI. Microbial processes within the soil In: Van Elsas JD, Trevors JT, Wellington EMH. (Eds). Modern Soil Microbiology, Marcel Dekker, New Youk: 1997;183 – 213.

Anderson JPE, Domsch KH. A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem.1978;10:215 – 221.

Drijber RA, Doran JW, Parkhurst AM, Lyon DJ. Changer in soil microbial community structure with tillage under long-term wheat-fallow management. Soil boil. Biochem. 2000; 32:1419 – 1430.

Hill GT, Mitlowski NA, Aldrich-Wolfe L, Emele LR, Jurkonie DD, Ficke A, Maldomado-Ramirez S, Lynch ST, Nelson EB. Method for assessing the composition and diversity of soil microbial communities. Applied Soil Ecology. 2000;15:25–36.

Colombo C, Palumbo G, Sannnino F, Gianfreda L. Chemical and biochemical of managed agricultural soil. 17th word congress of soil science, Bangkok, Thailand. 2002;1740:1 – 9.

Nannipieri P, Kandeler E, Ruggiero P. Enzyme activities and microbiological and biochemical processes in soil. In: Burns, R.P. (Eds). Enzymes in the Environment Activity, Ecology and Application. New Youk: Marcel Dekker. 2002;1–33.

Dick WA, Tabatabai AM. Significance and potential use of soil enzymes. In: Metting, F.B., (Eds), Soil microbial ecology: application in agricultural and environ-mental management. Marcel dekker. 1993; 95–125.

Van Beelen PV, Deelman P. Significance and application of microbial toxicity tests in assessing ecotoxicological risks of contaminations in soil and sediments. Chemosphere. 1997;43:455– 499.

Ibe OC, Cheng X. Stability conditions for multisequence systems with cyclic service. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 1988;33(1):102-103.

Chae VM, Tabatabai MA. Mineralization of nitrogen in soil amended with organic waste. J. Environ. Quality. 1985;15:193 -198.

Gee GW, Bauder JW. Particle size analysis. In: Klute A, (Eds). Methods of soil analysis. (Part 1, 2nd ed) agronomy monograph No: 9. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, W. I.1986;383 – 411.

Miroslav R, Vlandimir NB. Practical Environmental Cambridge (the Royal Society of Chemistry). 1998;309– 335.

Henrikson H, Selmer-Olsen AA. Automatic method for determining nitrate and nitrite in wate and soil extracts. Analysis, London. 1970;95:514–518.

Jackson WA, Frost CE, Hildreth DM. Versatile multi-range analytical manifold for automated analysis of nitrate-nitrogen. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 1975;39:391-593.

Kempers AJ. Determination of sub-microquantities of ammonium and nitrates in soil with phenol, sodium nitropresside and hypochlorite. Geoderma. 1974;12:201 -206.

Chapman HD. Cation exchange capacity. In: Black CA, et al, (Eds) Method of Soil Analysis. Am. Soc of Agronomy, inc. Madison, Wis. Agronomy. 1965;9:891- 901.

Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM. Assay of Urease Activity in Soils, Soil Biol, Biochem.1972;4:479 -487.

Alef K, Nannipieri P. Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press, London. 1995;20-25.

Dick RP. Soil enzyme assays as indicators of soil quality. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Special Publication No: 35, Soil Science, Soc. of Am. Madison. 1994;107–124.

Hattori H. Microbial activities in soil amended with sewage sludge. Soil. Sci. Plant Nutr. 1988;34(2):221–232.

Tyler G. Heavy metal pollution, phosphatase activity and mineralization of Organic phosphorus in forest soils. Soil Biol. Biochemistry. 1976;8:327–332.

Al-khafaji AA, Tabatabai MA. Effect of trace elements on aryluslphatase activity in soil. Soil Sci. 1979;127:129 –133.

Rogers JR, Li SW. Effect of metals and other Inorganic Irons on Soil Microbial Activity: Soil dehydrogenase assay as a simple toxicity test. Bull Environment Contain. Toxicol. 1985;34:856 -858.

Welp G. Inhibitory effects of the total and water-soluble concentrations nine different metals on the dehydrongenase activity of a loess soil. Biol. Fertile Soils. 1999;30:137-139.

Malis Zewska-Kordybuch B, Smreczek B. Habitat functional of agricultural soil as affected by heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons contamination. Environment Intern. 2003;28:719–728.

Dliaz-Burgos A, Ceccanti B, Polo A. Monitoring biochemical activity during sewage sludge composition. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 1993;16:145 – 150.

Gianfreda L, Bollag JM. Influence of natural and anthropogenic factors on enzymes activity in soil. In: Stotzky, G. Boltag JM, (Eds). Soil biochemistry. New York: Marcel Dekker,1996;9:123– 194.
  • Abstract View: 880 times
    PDF Download: 351 times

Download Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • WhatsApp
  • Telegram
Make a Submission / Login
Information
  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
Current Issue
  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo


© Copyright 2010-Till Date, Chemical Science International Journal. All rights reserved.