An Efficacious Supplementary Fertilizer Formulation from Agricultural Farm Biomass

Main Article Content

Echessa A. C. Peter
Nyambaka Hudson
Changamu Evans

Abstract

Though composting is a practical method of recycling plant macronutrients in organic matter, it is impractical with biomass like sisal leaf wastes, horns, hooves and feathers that take long to decompose. This biomass is therefore ignored; causing waste disposal hitches and yet are rich in plant macronutrients (nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium and calcium). This study set out to use them to formulate a supplementary fertilizer (SF). Samples of maize cobs and stalks, sugarcane bagasse, cattle hooves/horns and sisal leaf biomass were, taken through wet digestion before laboratory analysis for levels of nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium and calcium using standard procedures. Different formulations were obtained by mixing solvent digested hooves/horns (HD) with lye pre-treated sisal leaf biomass (CASD) giving ratios HD:CASD 0:1 (SF0), 1:1 (SF1), 2:1 (SF2), 3:1 (SF3), 1:2 (SF4) and 1:0 (SF5) that had varying pH values. Formulation SF1 (ratio 1:1 and pH 8.0) was used during fieldwork to evaluate the formulation's efficacy on the rate of growth, pest control and crop (maize) yield. Four sets of maize plots under varying fertilizer treatments or schedules (SF1/SF1, SF1/CAN, NIL/CAN and DAP/CAN) were replicated three times within the study area (Lugari Kakamega county, Kenya). There was no significant difference (p = 0.273) noted in the yields between the use of the formulation, SF1 and the commercial fertilizers DAP/CAN schedule. The stalk borer attack on the stems, fruits and tassels of the maize in plots that had nil fertilizer schedule (control) was in the range 60-75% compared to 10-15% and 4-7% in those where the supplementary fertilizer (SF1) and  DAP/CAN were respectively applied. The findings of this study showed that the agricultural biomass can be blend into an effective and efficient supplementary fertilizer with sufficient levels of plant macronutrients (N, P, K and Ca). The approaches used in material pretreatment shorten the period of decomposition compared to the traditional composting methods.

Keywords:
Biomass, macronutrients, formulation, supplementary, fertilizer, efficacy

Article Details

How to Cite
Peter, E. A. C., Hudson, N., & Evans, C. (2019). An Efficacious Supplementary Fertilizer Formulation from Agricultural Farm Biomass. Chemical Science International Journal, 28(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.9734/CSJI/2019/v28i430145
Section
Original Research Article

References

Achim D, Rebecca N. Opportunities and solutions for sustainable food production. Background paper submitted to high level panel of the development agenda; 2013.

Stewart WW, Dibb DW, Johnson AE, Smyth TJ. The contribution of commercial fertilizer nutrients food production. Agronomy Journal. 2005;97:1-6.

AESL. Plant analysis handbook, nutrient content of plants; 2010.

Shanker AK, Venkateswarlu B. Abiotic stress in plants mechanism and adaptations. Intech publishers, Rijeka, Croatia ISBN 978 953 307 394. 2011;428.

Morgan JB, Conolly EL. Plant soil interaction, nutrient uptake. Journal of National Education Knowledge. 2013;4:2.

Brown K, Root V. Environmental review of national solid waste management. International solid waste association. Academic press, London, UK; 1997.

Solano ML, Iriate F, Ciria P, Negro MJ. Performance characteristics of three aeration systems in the compository of sheep manure and straw. Journal of Agriculture Engineering Research. 2001; 79:317-329.

AOAC. Official methods of analysis.16th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC; 1995.

Thakur RK, Baghel SS, Sharma GD, Sahu RK, Amule PC. Advances in Agro-technologies for improving soil, plant and atmosphere systems. Laboratory Manual; 2012.

Omwoma S. Effect of Nitrogenous fertilizers on soil and water physicochemical paremeters in sugar cane farms, Kenya. An M.Sc. Thesis; 2014.

Kenya Soil Survey.. Soils of Lugari district. National Agricultural Research Laboratories KARI Nairobi Kenya; 2011.

Yan L, Low PF, Roth CB. Swelling pressure Mort movillonite layers verses H-O-H bending frequency of the interlayer water clays. Clay Miner. 1996;44:749-756.

USDA soil science staff. Soil identification and classification, soil survey manual. Agriculture handbook No. 18. 2017;245.

Perry L. The pH for the garden department of plant and soil science University of Vermomt Extension; 2003.
Available:http.//www.uv.edu/pss/ppp/pubs/oh34.htm. 25/04/2018

Wortman CS, Mamo M, Shapiro CA. Management strategies to reduce the rate of soil acidification University of Nebraska extension. Nebguide G1503; 2009.
Available:http:// extension publication

Njinga RL, Moyo MN, Abdul M. Analysis of essential elements for plants growth using instrumental neutron activation analysis. International Journal of Agronomy. 2013; 1:1-9.

NRCS- USDA. Inherent factors affecting soil pH management. Soil Quality Kit- guide for Education; 2017.

Epstein E. Mineral nutrition of plants, principles and perspectives. John Wiley and Sons inc, New York; 1972.

Filby RH. Isotopic and nuclear analytical techniques in biological systems. A Critical Study; 1995.

Kinsey N. Dangers using too much lime. The vital earth news, agriculture edition six no. 2; 2015.

Ball J. Understanding and correcting soil acidity. 70th Anniversary Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation; 1999.

Brady N, Weil R. The nature and properties of soils. 13th edition; 2002.

Goulding KWT. Soil acidification and importance of liming agricultural soils with particular reference to the United Kingdom. Soil Use and Management. 2016;32(3).

Slatone NA, Norman RJ, Gilmour JT. Oxidation rates of commercial elemental sulphur products to an alkaline silt loam from Arkansas. American Journal of Soil Society. 2001;65:239-243.

McClauley A. Soil pH and organic matter nutrient management module. Montanna State University Extension; 2009.

Muhammed S, Muhammed I, Azar A. Effect of different fertilizers on seed germination and seedling growth of sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) from district of blimber of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Parkistan. International Journal of Botany Studies. 2017;2:10-15.

Terence WH. Effects of fertilizer on the seedling emergence of vegetable crops. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture. 1976;10(10).

Adams JR, Merz AK. Hygroscopicity of Fertilizer Materials and Mixtures. Journal of Engineering Chemistry. 1929;21:305- 307.

Parminder S. Chahal, Amit J. Jhala. Factors affecting germination and emergence of glyphosate-resistant hybrid corn (Zea mays L.) and its progeny. Journal of Plant Science. 2016;96:613-620.

Fageria NK, Zimmerman FJP. Influence of pH on growth and nutrient uptake by crops species in an oxisol. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2008; 29:2675-2682.

Singh BB, Singh J, Singh G, Kaur G. Effects of long term application of inorganic and organic fertilizers on soil organic carbon and physical properties in maize–Wheat Rotation. Journal of Agronomy. 2015;5:220-238.

Ross P, Karen A. Nitrogen phosphorous, potassium values of organic fertilizers. Oregon state University extension service lane, LC 437; 2003.

Whiteman A, Dejohn S. Organic gardening for dummies. 2nd edition. Willey publishing: Inc. extracts of the national gardening association; 2009.

Alison R. Phosphorous photosynthesis. Farm AGPRO; 2016.

Mungai NW. How to control stalk borer in maize: Farmup connect. Egerton University Fact Sheets; 2017.

Gunewardena KNC, Madugalla SRK. Effects of different nitrogen fertilizer levels on stem borer (Chitopartellus swinhoe) damage on maize. Journal of Annals of Agriculture. 2014;16:105-114.

Wale MF, Schulthes, EW, Kairu CO Omwega. Cereal yield losses caused by labidopterous stem borers at different nitrogen fertilizer rates in Ethiopia. Journal of Applied Entomology. 2006;130:220-229.

Singh RK, Mittel PK, Gauvar K, Dhiman RC. Evaluation of mosquito larvicidal efficacy of leaf extract of a cactus plant Agave sisalana. Journal of Entomology and Zoology. 2014;2:83-86.

Pedrode ON. Environmental and sustainability: Transforming biomass into a resource: Fibre waste management systems. Opportunities, cost and technology report on advisory resources. Joint meeting of the inter-governmental group on hard fibres. Salvador Bahia; 2011.

Pizarro APB, Oliveira FAM, Parente JP, Melo MTV, Santos CE, Lima PR. The use of sisal waste Industry in controlling mosquito larvae. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicine Tropical. 1999; 32:23-29.

Ogabiela E. Preliminary phytochemical and anti-microbial screening of agave sisalana perrine juice (waste). Journal of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology. 2011;3:180-183.

Gadzirayi CT, Mutandwa E, Chikuvire TJ. Effectiveness of maize cob powder in controlling weevils in stored maize grain. Journal of African Studies Quarterly. 2006; 8(4).

FAO. Maize in human nutrition Food and Nutrition Series. 1992;25.

Rubink, WL, McCartney DA. Controlling stalk borer damage in field corn. Ohio Report. 1982;67:11–13.

Bailey, WC Pedigo LP. Damage and yield loss induced by stalk borer (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in field corn. Journal of Economic Entomology. 1986;79:233–237.

Lasack, PM, Bailey, WC Pedigo LP. Assessment of stalk borer (Lepidoptera: noctuidae) population dynamics by using logistic development curves and partial life tables; 1987.

Decker GC. The biology of the stalk borer, Papaipema nebris (Gn.). Agricultural Experiment Station, Iowa State College of Agriculture and Mechanical Arts, Research Bulletin No. 143, Ames, IA; 1931.

Rice, ME Pope R. Stalk borers–on the edge, in your corn.Integrated Crop Management Iowa State University Extension, Ames, IA. IC-496(13); 2006. Available:www.ipm.iastate.edu/ipm/icm/2006/5-30/stalkborer.html

Nyoro J, Kirimi L, Jayne TS. Competitiveness of Kenyan and Uganda multiple production. Challenges for the future. A working paper 10, Tegemeo Institute, Nairobi; 2004.

ACDI/VOCA. Increasing rural house hold incomes. Workshop on cost effective aflatoxin Risk reduction strategies in maize value chain 26th to 30th March; 2009.